Archive for December, 2009

Project RED Partners with Project Tomorrow

Friday, December 18th, 2009

Project RED has just announced a strategic partnership with Project Tomorrow, well known for its Speak Up surveys, in which the two organizations will review common results with an eye to creating a richer data set with information from both sources.

“We are looking at how teaching and learning practices by both principals and teachers lead to improved learning and financial savings,” says Jeanne Hayes, one of the co-authors of Project RED. “Partnering with Project Tomorrow makes sense since we can compare the difference in learning practices as described by school principals with opinions about school technology by their student respondents.”

According to Julie Evans, CEO of Project Tomorrow, “Since our goal is to prepare today’s students to be tomorrow’s innovators, Speak Up has always focused on students’ aspirations and views on technology in learning. We believe comparing the Speak Up survey findings to those of Project RED may lead to some interesting comparisons of technology-rich schools to others.”

Both surveys are offered online with Dec. 2009 deadlines. Take the Project Tomorrow survey by Dec. 23 and the Project RED survey by Dec. 31.

Groundbreaking Research: Project Red Early Results Are In!

Monday, December 7th, 2009

by Leslie Wilson

Project Red’s early results are in. They provide a peak into what is happening in technology rich school environments around critical success factors.  Findings directly speak to ‘Race to the Top’ criteria of ‘Teacher and Principal Reform’ which is 28% (highest value) of the grading criteria.

It is recognized that properly implemented ubiquitous technology (UT) in schools positively impacts student achievement, transformation of teaching and learning, and the overall education system’s efficiency/cost effectiveness.

One of the Project Red goals is to identify models of best practice in UT schools that lead to the above findings.  We are seeing preliminary trends in technology rich schools relative to leadership, professional learning for teachers and administrators, funding, problem-based teaching and learning, ed tech sustainability and funding.

Following is an overview of these initial findings.

Teacher Professional Learning in Technology Rich Schools

Seventy-seven percent of the UT schools indicated that teachers’ professional learning has been very well and adequately implemented.  To transform from traditional to student-centered teaching and learning, the professionals need consistent, high quality opportunities to grow and learn how to make the shift.  In these schools, this has been clearly a top priority.

Rate of Effectiveness of Teachers’ Professional Learning in UT Schools

Use of Problem-Based Learning in Technology Rich Schools

Twenty-six percent of UT schools engage problem-based learning activities many times a day and daily.  32.3% do so on a weekly basis.  Problem-based learning is a strategy for integrating 21st century skill development within curriculum and instruction.  This technique engages collaboration, projects, high level thinking and strategizing within content areas.

Rate of Problem-Based Learning Use in UT Schools

Principal’s Professional Learning in Technology Rich Schools

Leadership is the single most important factor for transforming schools.  To lead the required changes, unique professional growth experiences are needed.  It is significant that the Project Red identified UT schools demonstrate strong commitment to the principals’ ongoing training opportunities.  Thirty-eight percent of UT principals are engaged in ongoing professional development.  11% participated in short or long term courses.

Principals’ Professional Learning In Technology Rich Schools

Funding Sources for Technology Rich Schools

One hundred percent of the identified ubiquitous technology schools are funded through the district’s operating or capital outlay budgets. 38% are funded through state or federal competitive grants.  Demonstrated here is ubiquitous technology schools’ district or school level commitment of existing funds to implement the vision. Allocation of operating and capital outlay budgets indicates internal control for present and future funding. Reliance on grants (soft money) to fund these initiatives comes with greater uncertainty for long term sustainability.  Grants are not long term resource solutions and rely on others’ decision making to provide funding to districts/schools.

Stay tuned as the Project Red team continues to provide early insights into this groundbreaking research project!!